Evaluation of Government Bureaucracy in Public Administration Services at Rsud Dr. M. Yunus Bengkulu City

Authors

  • Bakat Seno Pratomo Universitas Ratu Samban

Keywords:

Evaluation, Public Services, Bureaucracy

Abstract

The research objective to be achieved in this research is to find out how to evaluate government bureaucracy in public administration services at RSUD Dr. M. Yunus, Bengkulu City. The type of research used in this research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. Qualitative research with a descriptive approach is intended to provide an overview of the Evaluation of Government Bureaucracy in Public Administration Services at Dr. Regional Hospital. M. Yunus, Bengkulu City.The results of the research show that reliability in inpatient health services is good, the alertness of doctors and the skills of the staff at the Dr. Regional General Hospital. M Yunus Bengkulu City in handling inpatients, handling patients in accordance with applicable procedures, and always prioritizing professionalism in providing services to patients. Empathy (empathy), the ability to respond to patient complaints was responded well by the Regional General Hospital staff, Dr. M Yunus Bengkulu City. And the empathetic attitude of hospital employees is quite good in providing excellent service in accordance with the vision and mission of Dr. General Hospital. M Yunus Bengkulu City p. The responsiveness of health workers to patients is good, listening to patients' needs and complaints, but in terms of service, health workers do not apply speed in working according to patient expectations. A form of assurance by hospitals is to provide clear information regarding service times for each patient so that patients can visit at the specified time. Physical evidence (tangible), facilities and infrastructure at the Regional General Hospital dr. M Yunus Bengkulu City has been adequate and supportive in assisting inpatient services at hospitals. However, the inpatient facilities are not yet complete and maintenance still needs to be improved.

References

Adler. 2009. Sistem Berorientasi Objek . Jakarta: Penerbit Informatika.

Anufia, B., & Alhamid, T. (2019). Instrumen pengumpulan data.

Harisson, Lisa. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Politik. Jakarta: Kencana.

Herdiansyah, Haris. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Miles, Matthew. B. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metodemetode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia

Moenir, H.A.S. 2010. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Moleong, J. Lexy. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Nurcholis, Hanif. 2005. Teori dan Praktek Pemerintahan dan Daerah . Jakarta: Grasind. Sedarmayanti. 2004. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Siagian, Sondang. P. 1994. Organisasi, Kepemimpinan, Perilaku Administrasi. Jakarta: CV. Haji Mas Agung.

Sinambela, Lijan. P. 2006. Reformasi Pelayanan Publik, Teori, Kebijakan dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Strauss, dan Corbin. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D. Elfaberta.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Keputusan MENPAN Nomor 63 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.

Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 129/Menkes/SK/II/2008 Tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Rumah Sakit.

Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No.1202/MENKES/SK/VIII/2003 Tentang Penerapan Indikator Provinsi Sehat dan Kab/Kota Sehat.

PERMENKES RI No 56 Tahun 2014 Tentang Klasifikasi dan Perizinan Rumah Sakit.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negegara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Undang-Undang Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor: 159b/MENKES/PER/II/1988/ Tentang Rumah Sakit.

Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Jurnal

Astaman, P., Canaldhy, R. S., & ... (2016). Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik Di Kecamatan Kemuning Kota Palembang Pasca Pemekaran Tahun 2008-2013. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 1(2), 10–13. http://ejournal.uigm.ac.id

Badri, M. I. (2021). Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Untuk Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik Dalam Prespektif Good Governance Di Kantor Kelurahan Pa'bundukang Kecamatan Polongbangkeng Selatan Kabupaten Takalar. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.

Jubaedah, Edah. 2011. Analisis Penerapan Model-Model Alternatif Penyediaan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 128.

Kamarni, Neng. 2011. Analisis Pelayanan Publik Tehadap Masyarakat (Kasus Pelayanan Kesehatan di Kabupaten Agam). Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan,

Winarti, E. (2018). Perencanaan manajemen sumber daya manusia lembaga pendidikan. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah, 3(1), 1-26

Wirajaya, M. K., & Nuraini, N. (2019). Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ketidaklengkapan Rekam Medis Pasien pada Rumah Sakit di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Informasi Kesehatan Indonesia (JMIKI), 7(2), 165

Zulfaton, Z., & Krisnanto Budi, A. (2017). Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik Dan Kinerja Aparat Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Di Kelurahan Dadaprejo Kota Batu. Manajemen Jaya Negara, 9(2), 104–115.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Bakat Seno Pratomo. (2024). Evaluation of Government Bureaucracy in Public Administration Services at Rsud Dr. M. Yunus Bengkulu City. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(1). Retrieved from https://penerbitadm.pubmedia.id/index.php/iso/article/view/1775

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.