Societal Analysis of Shipyard Industry Development in Batupute Village, Soppeng Riaja District, Barru Regency

Authors

  • Nur Alif Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Sakaria Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Sultan Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i2.4015

Keywords:

Industrial Development, Shipbuilding Industry, Societal Approach, Social Change, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Industrial development is often embraced as a pathway to economic growth and improved living standards. However, contemporary development practices increasingly exhibit a tendency to overlook social, cultural, and environmental dimensions, resulting in an imbalanced development paradigm. This study aims to analyze community perspectives on the development of the shipbuilding industry in Batupute Village, Soppeng Riaja District, Barru Regency, using a societal approach. A qualitative research design was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews using a snowball sampling technique to capture diverse perspectives from local residents. The analysis is grounded in the societal framework proposed by Paulus Wirutomo, which emphasizes the interconnection of structural, cultural, and processual dimensions in development. The findings indicate that the implementation of industrial development in the study area has not fully aligned with an ideal societal development model. Structurally, there are emerging inequalities and shifts in local economic patterns. Culturally, traditional values and community cohesion are experiencing gradual erosion. Processually, limited community participation and weak social integration mechanisms further exacerbate these issues. The lack of synchronization among these three dimensions reflects a broader disintegration within the development process. In conclusion, the development of the shipbuilding industry has yet to achieve a balanced integration of societal principles. These results underscore the importance of adopting more inclusive, participatory, and environmentally conscious development strategies to ensure that economic progress does not come at the expense of social and cultural sustainability

References

Asrulla, A., Rahman, F., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Qualitative research methods in social studies. Makassar: Academic Press.

Andalas Journal of Sociology. (2022). Social analysis from the perspective of structure, culture, and social processes. Andalas Journal of Sociology.

Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2018). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066

Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A. G., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Hinfelaar, M., & Sanborn, C. (2018). Governing extractive industries. World Development, 102, 245–257.

Cleaver, F. (2017). Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resource management. World Development, 92, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.015

Cornwall, A. (2016). Participation in development: Revisiting the idea of participation. Community Development Journal, 51(3), 495–512

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Toward a theory of social conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(2), 170–183.

Escobar, A. (2018). Development, critique, and alternatives: A social theory of development. Antipode, 50(2), 396–417.

Evans, P. (2014). Embedded autonomy revisited: Institutions, states, and development. World Development, 73, 30–40.

Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258–285.

Giddens, A. (2013). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. PolityPress.

Giddens, A. (2013). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. American Journal of Sociology, 89(4), 969–977.

Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development. Ecological Economics, 167, 106331.

Heryana, A., Nugraha, R., & Sari, D. (2018). Key informants in qualitative research: Concepts and applications. Journal of Social Research Methods, 12(2), 45–56.

IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 123–132.

Lumen Publishing. (2021). Culture and social identity in contemporary society. Postmodern Openings, 12(3), 45–60.

Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2016). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 236–254.

Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1985–2041.

Ningrum, D., & Lestari, S. (2022). Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research: Techniques and practices. Indonesian Journal of Qualitative Studies, 5(1), 1–10.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.

Sengkey, R., Tumbel, T., & Wullur, M. (2020). Snowball sampling technique in qualitative research: A practical approach. Journal of Community Research, 8(1), 23–30.

Social Investment Forum Indonesia. (2023). Pendekatan sosietal dalam memahami perubahan sosial. Jakarta: SIFI Press.

Scoones, I. (2016). The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 293–319.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford Development Studies, 27(3), 357–359.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development (13th ed.). Pearson.

UNDP. (2022). Human development report 2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. United Nations Development Programme.

UNDP. (2020). Human development report 2020. Human Development Review, 22(1), 45–67.

UNESCO. (2020). Culture 2030 indicators. UNESCO Publishing.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Global Policy, 6(3), 343–353.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2020). Industrial development report 2020: Industrializing in the digital age. UNIDO.

Wirutomo, P. (2022). Imajinasi sosiologi: Pembangunan sosietal. Jakarta: UI Press.

World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Alif, N., Sakaria, & Sultan. (2026). Societal Analysis of Shipyard Industry Development in Batupute Village, Soppeng Riaja District, Barru Regency. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 6(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i2.4015

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.