The Effect Of Hexagon Fraud Dimensions And Abuse Of Information Technology On Academic Fraud  (Case Study On Feb Students Of Trisakti University)

Zayyan Nailah; Murtanto Murtanto

doi:10.53697/emak.v4i4.1417

Authors

Zayyan Nailah Universitas Trisakti
Murtanto Murtanto Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53697/emak.v4i4.1417

Keywords:

fraud hexagon, Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Informasi, Kecurangan Akademik

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine how academic fraud is impacted by hexagon fraud (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Capability, Arrogance, and Collusion) dan misuse of information technology. 103 accounting students from Trisakti University made up the sample for this study. In this study, questionnaires were given out to collect the data. This study employed multiple linear regression analysis as its analysis method. The investigation's findings, which are the exclusive conclusions of this study, are as follows: (1) pressure has no bearing academic cheating (2) opportunity has no bearing on academic cheating (3) rationalization has no bearing on academic cheating (4) Academic cheating is not considerably impacted by capability (5) Academic cheating is considerably impacted by arrogance (6) Academic cheating is considerably impacted by collusion (7) Academic cheating is not significantly impacted by misuse of information technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2017). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5 (4), 38–45.

Abdi, A. P. (2019). Kemendikbud Catat 126 Kecurangan Selama Ujian Nasional 2019. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/kemendikbud-catat-126-kecurangan-selama-ujian-nasional-2019-drNd

Amin, M. L., Dhorivun, A., Sintawati, A. D., Ahmad, A., & Ardhiarisca, O. (2021). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Sektor Publik Politeknik Negeri Jember). Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 9(3), 380–388.

Arfiana, M., & Sholikhah, N. (2021). Fraud Diamond dan Literasi Ekonomi Sebagai Determinan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1623–1637.

Astrina et al. (2022). ISSN 1693-4091 E-ISSN 2622-1845 Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Fenty Astrina, Nina Sabrina, Mohammad Aryo Arifin, Hesti Agustini). Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 257–271.

Djaelani, Y., Zainuddin, & Mokoginta, R. M. (2022). Research in Business & Social Science Academic Fraud of students in the Covid-19 period : Testing with the Pentagon ’ s fraud dimension. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(2), 414–422.

Oktarigusta, L. (2017). Analisis Fraud Diamond Untuk Mendeteksi Terjadinya Financial Statement Fraud Di Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2012-2015). Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing, 19(2), 93–108.

Fadersair, K., & Subagyo, S. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi : Dimensi Fraud Pentagon (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Ukrida). Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(2), 122–147.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

Juliardi, D., Agung Sudarto, T., & Taufiqi, R. at. (2021). Fraud triangle, misuse of information technology and student integrity toward the academic cheating of UM student during the pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(6), 329–339.

Nur, V. I., Giri, E. F., & Pahlevi, F. (2022). Dimensi Fraud Triangle Dan Academic Entitlement Sebagai Determinan Perilaku Academic Fraud Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(3), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.53916/jeb.v18i3.42

Pratikna, R. N., Budiarto, N. R. P., & Sanjaya, R. (2021). Quality of work life pada turnover intention di perusahaan start-up , Adakah Pengaruhnya ? (Studi kasus pada Pt Xyz - berdasarkan persepsi karyawan ). Manners, IV(1), 49–60.

Prima, E. (2016). Ombudsman RI Temukan Kecurangan UN di 33 ProvinsiTitle. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/768570/ombudsman-ri-temukan-kecurangan-un-di-33-provinsi

Setyaki, R. S., & Andreas, H. H. (2021). Does Personality Impact Academic Fraud ? Integrative Business & Economics, 11(3), 81–98. http://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_11-3_05_m21-502_81-98.pdf

Sugianto, D. (2019). Garuda Diduga Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan, Bagaimana Pengawasan Rini? Detik Finance. https://finance.detik.com/bursa-dan-valas/d-4524789/garuda-diduga-manipulasi-laporan-keuangan-bagaimana-pengawasan-rini

Warni, P., & Margunani, M. (2022). Pengaruh Dimensi dalam Fraud Diamond dan Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Business and Accounting Education Journal, 3(1), 36–49.

Yendrawati, R., & Akbar, A. W. (2019). The Influence of the Fraud Triangle and Islamic Ethics on Academic Fraudulent Behaviors. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research (ISSN : 2304-1013), 8(4), 441–457.

Zaini, M., Carolina, A., & Setiawan, A. R. (2016). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap academic fraud (Studi kasus mahasiswa akuntansi se-Madura). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII, 2, Universitas Sumatera Utara.