Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Kawasan tanpa Asap Rokok di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah

Syarif Salingkat

doi:10.53697/iso.v4i2.1930

Authors

Syarif Permana Salingkat Program Studi Administrasi Publik, FISIP, Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v4i2.1930

Keywords:

Kebijakan, Kesehatan, Asap Rokok

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk mengetahui faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan kawasan tanpa asap rokok (KTR) di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kualitatif. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu berasal dari data primer (observasi) dan sekunder Analisis data kualitatif yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu model Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor yang memengaruhi kebijakan Kawasan Tanpa Asap Rokok (KTR) telah mengalami kemajuan signifikan. Namun, masih terhambat oleh kurangnya data terukur dan alat pemantauan yang efektif. Hal ini mengakibatkan penegakan hukum yang lemah dan ketidakpatuhan masyarakat terhadap peraturan. Sehingga, keberhasilan kebijakan KTR sangat bergantung pada komitmen dan dukungan dari pemerintah, masyarakat, dan lembaga terkait lainnya.

References

Aryoko, A. (2021). SMOKE FREE AREA (SFA) DISTRICT REGULATION SUPPORT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A CHILD FRIENDLY SCHOOL (CFS) IN KULON PROGO DISTRICT. Indonesian Journal of Public Health, 16(3), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijph.v16i3.2021.483-491

Boderie, N. W. (2023). Public support for smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and (semi-)private places: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101982

Boderie, N. W. (2024). Public support for smoke-free private indoor and public outdoor areas in the Netherlands: A trend analysis from 2018–2022. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 22. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/176141

Bommelé, J. (2022). Outdoor smoking as a nuisance to non-smokers: The case for smoke-free outdoor public spaces in dense urban areas. Tobacco Prevention and Cessation, 8. https://doi.org/10.18332/TPC/145502

BPS, 2023. Persentase Perokok di Indonesia. [Online]

Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTQzNSMy/persentase-merokok-pada-penduduk-umur---15-tahun-menurut-provinsi--persen-.html

[Accessed 17 Oktober 2024].

BPSSulawesiTengah, 2023. Persentase merokok penduduk. [Online]

Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTQzNSMy/persentase-merokok-pada-penduduk-umur---15-tahun-menurut-provinsi--persen-.html

[Accessed 19 Oktober 2024].

Kaplan, B. (2019). Smoke-free Turkey: Evaluation of outdoor areas of public places. Environmental Research, 175, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.003

Kemenkes, 2018. P2PTM. [Online]

Available at: https://p2ptm.kemkes.go.id/infographic-p2ptm/konsumsi-tembakau-faktor-risiko-penyakit-tidak-menular/75-persen-bahaya-asap-rokok-akan-dirasakan-oleh-perokok-pasif

[Accessed 18 Oktober 2024].

Kemenkes, 2019. Cegah. [Online]

Available at: https://ayosehat.kemkes.go.id/40-lebih-perokok-di-seluruh-dunia-meninggal-karena-penyakit-paru-paru#:~:text=40%25%20Lebih%20Perokok%20di%20Seluruh%20Dunia%20Meninggal%20karena%20Penyakit%20Paru%2DParu

[Accessed 17 Oktober 2024].

Liu, B. (2021). Small-Area Estimation of Smoke-Free Workplace Policies and Home Rules in US Counties. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 23(8), 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntab015

Morris, D. (2024). Potential smoke-free dividend across local areas in England: a cross-sectional analysis. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058264

O’donnell, R. (2020). Supporting parents living in disadvantaged areas of edinburgh to create a smoke-free home using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): A two-phase qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197305

Sansone, G. (2019). Secondhand smoke exposure and support for smoke-free policies in cities and rural areas of China from 2009 to 2015: A population-based cohort study (the ITC China Survey). BMJ Open, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031891

Satibi, I., 2017. Metode Penelitian Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Lemlit Unpad Press.

Subarsono, A. G., 2005. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

SMOKE-FREE OUTDOOR AREAS COULD REDUCE HEALTH RISKS. (2021). Community Practitioner, 94(5), 13. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118770673&origin=inward

Widati, S. (2022). THE ADVOCACY AND COMMUNICATION OF SMOKE-FREE AREA REGULATION IN EAST JAVA, INDONESIA. Indonesian Journal of Health Administration, 10(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v10i2.2022.232-240

Yin, H. (2023). Numerical assessment on aerodynamic free area of natural smoke and heat exhaust ventilator without and with side wind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2022.105288

Yuliani, S. (2022). The participation of Forum Anak Surakarta in developing children-friendly public spaces into a smoke-free area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1114/1/012055

Yuliani, S. (2023). The Development of Children Forum Capacity for Advocacy of Smoke-Free Area. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(4), 1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180415